Do Great Men Create Events Or Do Events Create Great Men? What About Robots?
This film, directed by McG, is in bleached color to give to it a grainy noir look but the film itself never achieves that atmosphere or feeling . Its model, like most of these films, is the dystopian noir created by Ridley Scott in Blade Runner. Sorry sports fans there is no one who even comes close to Deckard, Roy Batty, Rachael or Gaff here. However the film is more like Transformers which is about robots, the sequel to which is due out shortly.
It takes place in 2018, not too far away buckaroos, just after Judgment Day when the machines rose up to eliminate the humans.John Conner played by Christian Bale (who appears to be more robotic than the robots) is the leader of a human guerrilla movement made up of a central command cadre and many isolated groups survivingdespite the fact that HK (hunter killer) robots are searching for them directed by drones and the machine overall command, Skynet.Kyle Reese(Anton Yelchin) is in one of these isolated bands but in radio contact with central command.
There is no love interest or even and expectation of romance in this film Although Conner appears to have a wife or girlfriend the relationship is not developed. The film is more of a robot vehicle than a human one.
The humans are organizing into a resistance against the machines and they even have fighter aircraft at their disposal. The machines are perfecting their cyborg models. We see a prototype model of Arnold for a few seconds. However, mostly the more advanced robots are the stainless steel laser eyed models with out human skin reminiscent of Malcolm X in their intense glare.
Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington) is a former executed killer whose body parts have been assembled into a machine with a stainless steel frame, but with a human head, heart, brain and senses. He is obviously an early experimental type that will be later developed into the Arnold type seen in the first movie. He has been in a state of suspended animation until accidentally revived and left to wander in this post apocalyptic world. Although he was executed for murder he seems to have become a more thoughtful, sensitive soul, more man than machine.
Conner meets Kyle but doesn’t know who he is and is unaware that he will some day be his father. To him Kyle is just another snot nosed kid in the ragtag army he is assembling.
The driving force of the movie are the action scenesin a destroyed world and the fact that the robot man, Wright, who happens to be the only empathetic character, savesthelives of Conner and Reese to fight another day.
This is primarily an action film with a PG-13 rating (the original had an R rating) designed to appeal to the comic book set and not for adult consumption unless you have had a prefrontal lobotomy in a previous life. Since this franchise grosses more overseas than in the U.S. (expect the current one to gross around 500 milllion worldwide with box office split one third U.S. and two thirds overseas) the film was probably made more with the overseas audience in mind than the U.S. audience . So it was targeted at the lowest common denominator for the broadest appeal world wide. That said, the James Bond franchise with a similar boxoffice break down, except for the sci-fi factor, seems to put out a better film, at least lately, and the material I don't think is better just the writing, acting and direction.
This film has none of the hooks, verve, originality, damsel in distress or drama of the original film and we would not be talking about it if there had been no original. It probably would have gone straight to DVD.
Given all this one wonders ifKyle Reese was killed would it make any difference who went back to save Sarah so long As he was young and virile. All the strong qualities we see in Conner are those we see in Sarah.
Then again we may ask do great men emerge to meet the demands of trying times which gives them a chance to exhibit their hidden strengths. So if Conner never lived would there be some one else to take his place of equal or better ability?
If the Civil War had not occurred would Ulysses S. Grant have remained a drunken Ohiofarmer? Or if the Iraq War had been a success from the outset would David Petraeus have emerged out of the bowels of the Army bureaucracy?
If World War II had not occurred would Major Dwight Eisenhower have retired as a Lt Colonel of no particular distinction or would George S. Patton been allowed to distinguish his previously checkered career. This list goes on and on where men condemned to tedium rise to greatness when eventsoffer them their chance.
Shakespeare observed:
“There is a tide in the affairs of men.
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.”
So one wonders if another great leader would emergeif John Conner had not been born. Probably so. Too bad Conner aficionados. What about the robots? Will a great robot leader emerge to lead them? Young Darth Vader where are you? Sharpen your pencils screenwriters... or perhaps your minds and get to work.
It seems to me, in the future, that the humans should have a leader with a computer chip in his brain for enhanced memory and analytic abilities but one that would not deter from his human qualities, values, emotions (i.e. the ability to love and be loved) and most importantly, for winning over the robots, the ability to think out side the box and make inductive and deductive leaps. this doesn't sound like Christian Bales John Conner.
Red Sonja: Nice idea but the premise of the movie is unadulterated man versus the machines. In the first Terminator it was essentially Sarah, with the help of Kyle, versus Arnold.
Arnold was destined to play the role of a unfeeling robot and Linda Hamilton was well cast as Sarah. The present Terminator has none of that drama or conflict and that is the reason the audience is so unsatisfied and unfulfilled. Putting chips in Conner's head probably won't improve the story which appears to be dying with the fifth sequel.
I disagree with you Ed. This franchise is dying not because of the story because the the producers decided to dumb it down and make it a Transformer type action film in stead of a more thoughtful poignant film in the style of BladeRunner. There is still a lot of meat to work with here and perhaps John Conner with chips is the way to go to revive the series. Skynet is not visual enough they need a robot with a face and independence not directed by some remote Big Blue and some king of love interest maybe a human woman with a half robot like Marcus Wright who maybe resisting his fate.
Writer Paul Haggis worked on this film and also at least one of the more recent Bond films, Quantum of Solace, I believe. this leads me to conclude the franchise was deliberately dumbed down. As for the lack of a romantic aspect, most women didn't care for this film
Ed you can't hold all these sci fi pictures up to a Blade Runner runner standard. Scott made Aliens also and a lot more money on it. The directors of Terminator Salvation and Quantum of Solace deserve to put their own vision out there to sink or swim otherwise things would be really boring.
There is a lot of interesting topics left unexplored in the Terminator series. The real crunch is going to be between chip enhanced human brains of the good guys and the chip enhanced brains of bad guys in the world. Think about if Kim Il Jong has his kids enhanced. You know the heir apparent.
Human flesh eating or perhaps blood drinking robots for a power source would put the series up there with the Vampire movies. I always thought the Terminator ran on a power cell. Maybe if the cell ran out they could convert human blood into energy. They could go on forever just like Arnold. Seems like box office gold and plausable. More logical than the Twilight series but no love interest.
It seems to me, in the future, that the humans should have a leader with a computer chip in his brain for enhanced memory and analytic abilities but one that would not deter from his human qualities, values, emotions (i.e. the ability to love and be loved) and most importantly, for winning over the robots, the ability to think out side the box and make inductive and deductive leaps. this doesn't sound like Christian Bales John Conner.